Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Quadrevision Live: The Quad/Rogers 405 studio monitor


A very interesting amplifier has fallen into my hands!

Quad used to make OEM amps for the BBC, as studio monitors.

Quad worked together with Rogers, which made an active 2-channel filter with symmetric .650 V inputs and the loudspeakers that go with it.

The left channel of the 405 is used for the high tones, the right channel for the bass-tones .

The tweeter-channel is limited with the voltage-limiter originally intended by Quad for connecting the ESL speakers. Nice ;-)

Specific Neutrik-cables were designed for the set to connect the speakers and to connect the inputs to a symmetric pre-amp or mixing-table.

Revision step 1: Making a phase-shifter

As the input is a symmetric one we'll have to make a phase-shifter in order to connect the signal-generator in a symmetric way to the filter for measuring-reasons. With a breadboard and a single transistor this can be done in 5 minutes.


Now we are ready to measure the filter and check the bandwidth of both low and high channels on the scope. We will use a 1 KhZ .650 Volt sinus to start with.

But first we'll have to replace the old capacitors on the filter-board. Rogers used Tantalum capacitors that are awful for audio-applications but I guess they were fashionable in the 7-ties %-)

I'll take my bike and go to the electronics-shop. See you later.

In the meantime you should also take a look @ http://www.mhennessy1.f9.co.uk/rogers/ls58.htm

Revision Step 2: Checking the Filters

Revising and upgrading the 405-modules was straightforward, as I did about 100 of them before. Both amps (you have one per Rogers 5/8 speaker of course) have been made with +/- 4 years difference (1979 and 1982).

I think this is normal, the BBC ordered several hunderds of them from Quad/Rogers for on-the-road usage and stored them in the same warehouse. We can not expect similar pairs to stay together.

We are looking @ 2 405's with totally different Rogers-filters inside. Since 1982 Rogers removed the "Bass boost" option and simplified the schematic. The newer filter shows a strong distortion due to the input-transformer, which was to transform the symmetrical input to a non-symmetrical signal for the filter.

The Rogers-filters were built with transistors and very old components and there are no schematics to be found...

Revision Step 3: giving up the project...

There were many reasons why Jean-Marie and myself were very unhappy with the Rogers crossover filters.

Rogers used a small transformer to change the balanced input-signal to unbalanced in the input-line. Although this transformer does the job it causes a lot of distortion and phase-shifting.

The filter is made with transistors and some very old components, some of which were broke. The schematics can't be found.

So we decided to remove the filters, upgrade the Quad's and use a Behringer active filter instead.

Jean-Marie bought one for only 100 Euro. New, with a 2 year warranty. We'll connect it next week and we'll keep you posted...

What Peter Walker said about active crossovers (In an interview with Adio Amateur, 1978):

"AA: Some people like splitting up the signal with electronic crossovers, Do you see problems in that?

PW: It would cost more money! Provided you're not overloading, there are no advantages. If you've got three amplifiers covering three ranges, then you can run into overload with less trouble, because the bass can overload and it won't inter modulate the high. Therefore we can get away with more distortion audibly successfully. If you're saying that an amplifier should never run into clipping, then using three amplifiers is no better than one amplifier. One amplifier with three times the power would be rather better, because at least the power can come in any part of the frequency range. So a hundred Watt amplifier covering the lot would be better than three 30 Watt amplifiers, middle, bass, and treble. Because if all the signal comes in the middle, which it can do, then you're only limited to 30 Watts - the other amplifiers are sitting idly by and you'd like them to come along to the middle one's aid, and they can't do that."

You can read the full article on The Audio Circuit (http://www.audiocircuit.com).

Stefaan

1 Comments:

Anonymous jeroen said...

hallo stefaan
ik heb met belangstelling je stukje over de aktief filter van de ls5/8 gelezen.
ik heb deze luidsprekers van jean marie gekocht samen met het behringer filter . ik heb het nog niet uitgeprobeerd want 1 tweeter is kapot . heb je de behringer geprobeerd met de ls5/8 en wat was je ervaring ? groet jeroen.

10:55 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home